Seagrasses are among the most important foundation species in coastal ecosystems, providing habitat for marine life, stabilising sediments, and helping improve water quality. Yet nearly 20% of the world’s historic seagrass cover has been lost, and efforts to restore these vital underwater meadows often face significant challenges. In Florida’s Indian
On the western side of Lake Macquarie in New South Wales, Australia, sits Myuna Bay – a quiet bay with meadows of seagrass waving beneath the water. The most common marine plant species you find there is Zostera muelleri. It has long ribbon-like leaves that grow from stems (called rhizomes)
The FANNS programme took place between 2024 and 2026. One of the focuses within the programme was on improving the natural environment through a series of restoration trials across multiple Special Areas of Conservation in South and West Wales. These trials aimed to establish the most effective methods of planting seagrass
Jasper Brown, one of Project Seagrass’ Interns for the 2025-26 academic year and 3rd Year Student in BSc Zoology with Marine Zoology at Bangor University, explores the need for both active and passive restoration to secure a future for our important seagrass habitats. Marine ecosystems worldwide are under threat. Rising
In 2024, the Project Seagrass team introduced the Seagrass Hug to our planting methodology. The method was developed by Anouska Mendzil, Senior Science Officer at Project Seagrass and Swansea University, and aims to determine whether surrounding seeding plots with more established transplants provides protection for emerging seeds in restoration practices.
The Ocean is in crisis. Coral reefs are bleaching, seagrass meadows are vanishing, mangroves are being cleared, and biodiversity is plummeting. Scientists estimate we’ve already lost up to 50% of global saltmarshes, 35% of mangroves, and 20% of seagrasses. Yet alongside this sobering decline, momentum for marine restoration has never
Posidonia seagrass meadows, veritable underwater forests, play a major ecological role. Under constant pressure from human activity, scientists are looking for ways to ensure their survival, in particular by carrying out restoration campaigns. A study conducted by the University of Liège at the marine and oceanographical research station STARESO (Calvi,
Dr Richard Unsworth, Chief Scientific Officer at Project Seagrass, along with 35 other leading scientists from across the UK, responds to proposals from the UK government to make licensing for marine restoration more complex and costly. Dear Rt Hon Steve Reed OBE MP and team, This letter sets out our
Earlier this year, Project Seagrass welcomed Rhys Bowen to the team to support our work in North Wales as part of the Seagrass Ocean Rescue North Wales programme. This follows on from Rhys’ involvement in the programme during 2024 where we worked as one of the Marine Futures Interns at
Gathaagudu/Shark Bay is located on Malgana (pronounced Mal-guh-nuh) Country. It’s a place of great natural beauty and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The landscape is a stunning array of colors as the desert meets the ocean. Below the sea’s surface, 4,000 square kilometers of seagrass meadows sway. That’s equivalent to
Seagrasses are among the most important foundation species in coastal ecosystems, providing habitat for marine life, stabilising sediments, and helping improve water quality. Yet nearly 20% of the world’s historic seagrass cover has been lost, and efforts to restore these vital underwater meadows often face significant challenges. In Florida’s Indian River Lagoon (IRL), widespread seagrass losses following harmful algal blooms have left many areas with little natural recovery. Now, researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute have identified a resilient native seagrass species that could offer a new approach to restoring degraded estuarine habitats. The study, published in Regional Studies in Marine Science, provides new insight into the life history and potential restoration applications of Ruppia maritima, a relatively uncommon seagrass in the IRL that has persisted in some of the lagoon’s most environmentally altered areas, including mosquito impoundments that can be especially challenging to seagrass while also offering a promising study environment. They are hydrologically altered wetlands separated from the lagoon by dikes and water-control structures. Seasonal reconnection through Rotational Impoundment Management creates fluctuating water levels and water quality, making these systems challenging environments for seagrasses. At the same time, they offer a unique setting to study how R. maritima withstands repeated disturbance and what makes the species potentially valuable for restoration. Ruppia maritima were transplanted into aquaculture tanks at the FAU Harbor Branch Seagrass Nursery to evaluate their growth, reproduction and potential for nursery cultivation. Credit FAU Harbor Branch To investigate, researchers followed R. maritima from the field to the laboratory and nursery. Over three years, they monitored naturally occurring populations at two sites within Bee Gum Point Nature Preserve, tracking seasonal changes in seagrass coverage, biomass and environmental conditions. They also examined the sediment seed bank and conducted laboratory experiments to determine which conditions trigger seed germination. In addition, plants collected from the preserve were transplanted into aquaculture tanks at the FAU Harbor Branch Seagrass Nursery to evaluate their growth, reproduction and potential for nursery cultivation. Results revealed that R. maritima follows a distinctive annual life cycle, growing primarily from late winter through spring, flowering and then dying back during summer. Despite seasonal flooding and deteriorating water quality, the population returned year after year. Researchers found the key beneath the sediment: a persistent seed bank that survived unfavorable conditions and regenerated when conditions improved, with laboratory experiments showing that lower salinity, particularly freshwater exposure, strongly stimulated germination. “Ruppia maritima has a remarkable ability to persist through disturbance,” said Rachel Brewton, Ph.D., senior author and an assistant research professor at FAU Harbor Branch. “Even when the plants disappear above ground, the population can persist as a seed bank in the sediment, waiting for conditions to become favorable.” Ruppia maritima from Bee Gum Point Nature Preserve. Credit FAU Harbor Branch The species demonstrated similar resilience in cultivation. Transplanted R. maritima established successfully in aquaculture tanks at FAU’s seagrass nursery, following a seasonal growth pattern similar to the wild population and producing viable seeds. Most notably, the cultivated population has remained self-sustaining in the nursery since its establishment in 2021. “That ability to regenerate from a persistent seed bank, combined with its successful cultivation in our seagrass nursery, is what makes this species particularly interesting from a restoration perspective,” said Richard Mulroy, study co-author and biological scientist at FAU Harbor Branch. The results suggest that R. maritima may serve as a useful pioneer species in IRL restoration—one capable of rapidly colonizing bare or disturbed areas and potentially helping create conditions for broader seagrass recovery. “Rather than simply replacing established seagrass communities, we see potential for Ruppia maritima to help initiate recovery in places where habitat has been lost,” said Deanna Webber, primary study author and research coordinator at FAU Harbor Branch. “Its ability to come back from seed after periods of environmental stress suggests it may be useful for disturbed systems where conditions are not always predictable.” The findings also support further exploration of seed-based restoration as a potentially useful strategy. During laboratory trials, R. maritima seeds remained viable during prolonged exposure to high salinity and germinated after freshwater exposure, suggesting that seeds could potentially be collected, stored and propagated before being introduced into restoration sites. The next step is field testing to determine where and how R. maritima performs best. Researchers will evaluate aquaculture-derived plants and seed-based approaches under natural conditions and identify the environmental conditions, planting methods and restoration goals for which the species provides the greatest benefit. “The goal of restoration is not simply to put seagrass back—it is to create the conditions for a functioning ecosystem to recover,” Brewton said. “If future field trials confirm what we are seeing in the laboratory, nursery and natural populations, Ruppia maritima could give restoration practitioners another tool for rebuilding seagrass habitat in the Indian River Lagoon and potentially other disturbed estuaries around the world.” More information: This article is republished from Phys.org Read the research paper here: Deanna F. Webber et al, Ecology and restoration potential of Ruppia maritima in a managed mosquito impoundment of the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA, Regional Studies in Marine Science (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2026.105271
On the western side of Lake Macquarie in New South Wales, Australia, sits Myuna Bay – a quiet bay with meadows of seagrass waving beneath the water. The most common marine plant species you find there is Zostera muelleri. It has long ribbon-like leaves that grow from stems (called rhizomes) buried beneath the sediment and provides important shelter for small fish, shrimp and crabs. Although Myuna Bay looks quite normal, it is actually a bit unusual. For decades, the nearby Eraring power station released warm water into the lake that was used to cool down their systems, causing water temperatures here to be consistently 1°C to 3°C higher than nearby sites. This made the bay a rare natural laboratory for understanding what warming oceans might mean for coastal ecosystems. In our new research, published today in the journal New Phytologist, we used this setting to investigate what happens to seagrass and the microbes living in the sediment when ocean temperatures increase in the way climate models predict they will in the future. Experimental design. Sediments (intact or disrupted microbial communities via autoclaving) and seagrass (Zostera muelleri) plants (with intact or disrupted rhizosphere microbial community) were transplanted into the warm environment to test how belowground microbes affect seagrass performance under elevated ocean temperatures. Six plants (two from each of the three ambient and warm sites) were randomly placed into each pot with five replicate pots per treatment. Credit: New Phytologist (2026). One of the most important coastal habitats Seagrasses are often overlooked, but they are among the most important coastal habitats on Earth. They are marine flowering plants that stabilize sediments, improve water clarity and provide food and shelter for many marine animals. They also store large amounts of carbon in the sediments beneath them, making them important for slowing climate change. But seagrasses don’t function alone. Beneath the leaves, in the sediments, lives a hidden ecosystem of microbes: bacteria, fungi and other microscopic organisms that interact with the plant. Just as plants on land depend on soil microbes, seagrasses rely on microbial communities in the sediment around their roots. These microbes carry out many important processes. Some provide nutrients that plants need to grow. Others break down organic matter or detoxify harmful compounds in the sediment. In some ways, the relationship can be compared to the partnership between corals and the microscopic algae living inside them. Corals rely on those algae for energy, while seagrasses depend on microbes to help maintain a healthy environment around their roots. But not all microbes are helpful. Some produce sulfide, a compound that can be toxic to seagrass roots when it accumulates in sediments. We are starting to find out that whether microbial communities help or harm the plant can depend strongly on environmental conditions, including increases in ocean temperatures due to climate change. Simulating future ocean warming in the field To understand how ocean warming might affect the relationship between seagrasses and microbes in the sediment under realistic future conditions, we designed a field experiment at Myuna Bay. We collected seagrass plants and sediments from both warmer and “normal” temperature sites in Lake Macquarie. Some plants were grown in sediments with their microbial communities intact. In other treatments, the sediments were heated to 121°C to disrupt the microbes; this reduces total bacterial abundance by more than 95%. This allowed us to test how plants performed when the microbial community was intact versus when it had been disrupted. We then placed plants in pots with those different sediments and exposed the plants to warmer conditions at Myuna Bay, similar to those expected in the future. After one month, we monitored how the plants responded. We measured how they survived, how many shoots they produced and how their biomass changed over time. At the same time, we analyzed the bacterial communities in the sediment using DNA sequencing to see how they differed between treatments. Looking beyond plants When plants were grown in sediments from “normal” temperature sites, seagrass performed well whether the microbes were intact or disrupted. But when plants were grown in sediments from warmer sites, the outcome changed: plants growing with intact sediment microbial communities performed worse. These sediments from the warm areas also contained different bacterial communities, which may help explain the lower plant biomass we observed. One possible explanation involves sulfide. In seagrass sediments, certain microbes produce sulfide as part of their metabolism. At high concentrations, sulfide can be toxic for seagrasses. Warmer temperatures may stimulate microbial activity, increasing sulfide production and tipping the balance from a supportive microbial community to one that harms the plant. Our findings highlight an important idea: the impacts of climate change on seagrasses can’t be understood by looking at the plants alone. The microbial communities living in the sediment can also influence how these plants respond to warming. This has important implications for conservation and restoration. Around the world, seagrass meadows are declining due to coastal development, pollution and climate change. Restoration projects often focus on planting seagrass shoots or seeds. But the condition of the surrounding sediment, including its microbial community, may also determine whether restoration succeeds. As oceans continue to warm, the future of seagrass meadows may depend not only on the plants we see when snorkelling, but also on the microscopic microbes living in the sediment beneath them. More information: This article is republished from Phys.org Read the research paper here: Ocean warming indirectly affects seagrass performance through effects on sediment microbial communities – Jongen – New Phytologist – Wiley Online Library
The FANNS programme took place between 2024 and 2026. One of the focuses within the programme was on improving the natural environment through a series of restoration trials across multiple Special Areas of Conservation in South and West Wales. These trials aimed to establish the most effective methods of planting seagrass out into the field. Carmarthen Bay and Estuaries SAC Following site assessments and stakeholder engagement, Ellis Bay in Llanelli was identified as the site for the restoration trials within the Carmarthen Bay and Estuaries SAC. Zostera noltei was identified as the most appropriate species for restoration at this site due to the estuary’s intertidal nature and sediment characteristics. In May 2024, the Project Seagrass team were joined in the field by Carmarthen Bay & Estuaries European Marine Site Officer Judith Oakley and Carmarthen Conservation Coordinator Paul Aubrey. 75 Zostera noltei cores were transplanted from a healthy donor meadow near Llanelli to the Llanelli trial site using the plug method. Monitoring later that summer in August 2024 demonstrated positive results with a significant percentage (40 %) increase in growth from the initial core size, indicating strong early establishment and expansion. These results were highly encouraging, suggesting that Llanelli site conditions were suitable for Zostera noltei transplant success. Members of the Project Seagrass team, Carmarthen Bay & Estuaries, and Carmarthenshire Council collect Zostera noltei transplants from a donor meadow in Llanelli. A Zostera noltei core collected from a donor meadow ahead of transplantation. Building on the success of the 2024 trial, further planting took place in May 2025. 72 Zostera noltei transplants were collected from the donor meadow. The 2025 planting plots were located further towards the foreshore to enable the team to explore planting into alternative sediment types and to more closely reflect the distribution of the natural meadow on the western side of the Bay. Monitoring of both the 2024 and 2025 planting efforts took place in August 2025 with the 2025 planting plots evidencing significant loss. Shortly after transplanting, the site experienced a period of elevated temperatures followed by storm events. Sediment redistribution around the plots was evident during the team’s monitoring which may have destabilised newly planted cores, while heat stress would have compounded physiological stress following transplantation. The previous years planting survival was more varied but generally stronger with plots located closer to the low shore within muddier sediments showing higher survival rates and successful expansion, in some cases demonstrating up to 35% growth relative to the original core size. Plots positioned closer to the foreshore experienced comparatively greater loss. The contrast between 2024 and 2025 results highlights the importance of sediment stability and micro-site selection in transplant success. Given the positive expansion observed in 2024, there is a strong case for scaling up transplant effort within suitable sediment areas across the bay with plans for further transplant trials in Llanelli to build upon this learning. Severn Estuary SAC Within the Severn Estuary SAC, Butetown foreshore in Cardiff was selected as the site for planting trials. This location was identified based on Habitat Suitability Modelling, desk-based reviews, and in-field surveys which revealed the presence of three small, isolated Zostera marina seagrass patches at the site. In May 2024, the Project Seagrass team planted 60,000 Zostera marina seagrass seeds at the Cardiff site, using the Direct Injection Seeding (DIS) planting method developed by The Fieldwork Company. Monitoring later in the summer revealed no germination success from these planting efforts which led to a smaller repeat trial in 2025. A further 3,200 seeds were planted using the DIS method, this time adopting a Seagrass Hug configuration. The Seagrass Hug method has been developed by Anouska Mendzil, Senior Science Officer at Project Seagrass and Swansea University, and aims to determine whether surrounding seed plots with more established seagrass transplants provides protection for emerging seeds in restoration practices. This trial was undertaken in collaboration with the Seagrass Consortium. A total of 525 seagrass transplants were planted at the Cardiff site as part of the trials with varying degrees of success. 75 Zostera noltii transplants planted in 2024 initially showed signs of survival which would have established the presence of an additional seagrass species at the site, creating the potential for future development of a mixed meadow. However, by 2025 these transplants had been lost. 450 Zostera marina further transplants from the Project Seagrass Nursery were planted out in 2025, using coir pots of varying sizes and a mixture of plants that had been hardened outdoors in ponds at the Seagrass Nursery, while the remainder were grown inside the polytunnel. These trials allowed the team to undertake a comparison of transplant establishment by container type and nursery conditioning to inform future restoration approaches. Whilst monitoring highlighted that there had been significant loss from the initial number of transplants planted, several shoots persisted across the different planting methods. However, remaining shoots were generally found to be stressed and silt-covered, indicating environmental pressures at the site. Senior Science Officer Emma Fox undertakes monitoring at the Cardiff site Zostera noltii cores prepared for transplantation in May 2024 Throughout the programme of work, environmental data was gathered at the site to allow the team to monitor site conditions which might have impacted the success of the planting. Several environmental factors are likely to have influenced the restoration success at this particular site including elevated wave energy, high pool temperatures, silt smothering within intertidal pools, high epiphytic load, and the potential that the Zostera marina nursery stock used (from a source population in North Wales) may not represent the optimal ecotype for this environment. The Cardiff trials demonstrated that the Direct Injection Seeding method is not suitable for restoration at Cardiff under current site conditions. Transplant-based approaches showed limited but measurable persistence, with container type influencing relative survival. However, overall survival rates remain low, suggesting that environmental constraints may outweigh methodological refinements at the current scale of intervention. Further trials using transplants from a seagrass meadow in Stolford will allow the team to trial whether plants with a more comparable ecotype show higher levels of success at the site. Pembrokeshire Marine SAC Dale Bay within Pembrokeshire SAC, continued to serve
Jasper Brown, one of Project Seagrass’ Interns for the 2025-26 academic year and 3rd Year Student in BSc Zoology with Marine Zoology at Bangor University, explores the need for both active and passive restoration to secure a future for our important seagrass habitats. Marine ecosystems worldwide are under threat. Rising temperatures, ocean acidification, and water pollution are just a few of the key drivers in the decreasing quality of our marine ecosystems. Researchers have found that many aquatic species are shifting poleward at an average rate of 70 kilometres every decade (Melbourne-Thomas et al., 2021) – a vast response to changing conditions. Species such as the American Lobster, Cushion Star, and Humboldt Squid have nearly doubled their latitude range, showing the clear extent of this poleward shift in marine species (Pinsky et al., 2020). Why are they moving? One crucial reason is habitat loss. Seagrass meadows, coral reefs, and kelp forests are disappearing worldwide, reducing opportunities for biodiversity and removing essential nursery habitats for marine life. The solution is clear: we must conserve and restore. Across the globe, charities and organisations are embracing active restoration – direct interventions to rebuild habitats. The work consists of planting seagrass, reforesting mangroves, and coral Gardening. All of which provide crucial environmental benefits: large carbon sinks, coastal protection, and providing nursery habitats. Seagrass planting involves transplanting seeds and rhizomes near existing meadows (do Amaral Camara Lima et al., 2023). Coral gardening uses nurseries to grow coral fragments, which are later transplanted to reefs that support approximately 25% of all marine species (Rinkevich, 2014; Gallagher, 2025; Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, 2022). Mangrove reforestation involves planting seedlings along suitable coastlines (Zahra Farshid et al., 2022; Bimrah et al., 2022). These methods are being implemented worldwide, from the Persian Gulf in western Asia to the Firth of Forth in Scotland. Yet, challenges persist. Active restoration projects are costly, often relying on charitable donations and grants (Paling et al., 2009). Despite these hurdles, active restoration works, a recent review by Danovaro (2025), found an average success rate of 64% across 764 projects. Is active restoration enough? However, success depends on environmental conditions; water clarity, for example, is critical for seagrass survival due to photosynthesis requiring sufficient light. Declining clarity, driven by pollution, bottom trawling, and dredging, increases turbidity, which limits restoration efforts (Paling et al., 2009). This is where passive restoration comes in Passive strategies focus on removing environmental pressures and creating conditions for ecosystems to heal naturally. Examples include implementing policies to regulate fertilizer use and reduce nutrient runoff, as well as enforcing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). These acts will reduce eutrophication in our waterways and lead to a more stable marine environment, leading to the eventual reduction in coral bleaching and seagrass meadow reduction. MPAs have been shown to restore ecosystem functions such as predation (Cheng et al., 2019), highlighting their critical role in maintaining biodiversity. Conclusion While MPAs are just one example, they perfectly highlight the value of passive restoration in its entirety. The greatest benefits come from integrating passive and active approaches. By enforcing regulations and establishing strict no-trawl zones, we can reduce nutrient loads and sedimentation. Through these efforts, our marine ecosystems will one day thrive again, meaning we get to see the animals and plants we so dearly care about. References Bimrah, K., Dasgupta, R., Hashimoto, S., Saizen, I., & Dhyani, S. (2022). Ecosystem Services of Mangroves: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Contemporary Scientific Literature. Sustainability, 14(19), 12051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912051 Bulmer, R. H., Townsend, M., Drylie, T., & Lohrer, A. M. (2018). Elevated Turbidity and the Nutrient Removal Capacity of Seagrass. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00462 Cheng, B. S., Altieri, A. H., Torchin, M. E., & Ruiz, G. M. (2019). Can marine reserves restore lost ecosystem functioning? A global synthesis. Ecology, 100(4), e02617. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2617 Danovaro, R., Aronson, J., Bianchelli, S., Boström, C., Chen, W., Cimino, R., Corinaldesi, C., Cortina-Segarra, J., D’Ambrosio, P., Gambi, C., Garrabou, J., Giorgetti, A., Grehan, A., Hannachi, A., Mangialajo, L., Morato, T., Orfanidis, S., Papadopoulou, N., Ramirez-Llodra, E., & Smith, C. J. (2025). Assessing the success of marine ecosystem restoration using meta-analysis. Nature Communications, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57254-2 do Amaral Camara Lima, M., Bergamo, T. F., Ward, R. D., & Joyce, C. B. (2023). A Review of Seagrass Ecosystem services: Providing nature-based Solutions for a Changing World. Hydrobiologia, 850(12-13), 2655–2670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05244-0 Gallagher, M. (2025, August 24). What Ecosystem Services Do Coral Reefs Provide? – Green Packs. GreenPacks. https://greenpacks.org/what-ecosystem-services-do-coral-reefs-provide/ Melbourne-Thomas, J., Audzijonyte, A., Brasier, M. J., Cresswell, K. A., Fogarty, H. E., Haward, M., Hobday, A. J., Hunt, H. L., Ling, S. D., McCormack, P. C., Mustonen, T., Mustonen, K., Nye, J. A., Oellermann, M., Trebilco, R., van Putten, I., Villanueva, C., Watson, R. A., & Pecl, G. T. (2021). Poleward bound: adapting to climate-driven species redistribution. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-021-09641-3 Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center. (2022, June 27). Role of Reefs in Coastal Protection | U.S. Geological Survey. Www.usgs.gov. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/pcmsc/science/role-reefs-coastal-protection Paling, Fonseca, M., Katwijk, M., & Keulen, van. (2009). Seagrass restoration. In Coastal wetlands: an integrated ecosystems approach. (pp. 687–713). Rinkevich, B. (2014). Rebuilding coral reefs: does active reef restoration lead to sustainable reefs? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 7, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.018 Zahra Farshid, Reshad Moradi Balef, Tuba Zendehboudi, Dehghan, N., Mohajer, F., Siavash Kalbi, Hashemi, A., Afshar, A., Tabandeh Heidari Bafghi, Hanieh Baneshi, & Amin Tamadon. (2022). Reforestation of grey mangroves (Avicennia marina) along the northern coasts of the Persian Gulf. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 31(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-022-09904-1
In 2024, the Project Seagrass team introduced the Seagrass Hug to our planting methodology. The method was developed by Anouska Mendzil, Senior Science Officer at Project Seagrass and Swansea University, and aims to determine whether surrounding seeding plots with more established transplants provides protection for emerging seeds in restoration practices. Anouska said: “In this restoration methodology trial we sought to incorporate different Zostera marina life stages by means of seeds and transplants, in a planting design aimed to minimise, and test, hydrodynamic impact on planted seagrass. By implementing multiple restoration strategies, we hope to improve seagrass restoration success and gain valuable knowledge in life-stage bottlenecks to seagrass survival and resilience, site-specific interactions, and insights for scaling-up. The Seagrass Consortium have been wonderful partners in collaborating on this cross-European wide trial, working towards furthering our understanding on seagrass meadow restoration, recovery, resilience and rehabilitation” Members of the Project Seagrass team planting seagrass seeds at Thorness, Isle of Wight using the DIS method. Photo credit Francesca Page. Members of the Project Seagrass team planting seagrass transplants at Thorness, Isle of Wight. Photo credit Francesca Page. The Seagrass Hug Method. Graphic provided by Anouska Mendzil Initial trials of the method took place as part of spring planting efforts in the Isle of Wight, in South England, forming part of active restoration work taking place as part of the Solent Seascape Project. The approach involves planting seagrass seeds using the Dispenser Injection Seeding (DIS) method (developed by The Fieldwork Company) and surrounding these seeding plots with more established seagrass transplants using a bare-root plant with anchoring peg. Project Seagrass’ planting trials used seagrass transplants grown from seed at our Seagrass Nursery in West Wales and local donor meadow transplants to provide the “hug” which will also be tested as part of the experiment. https://www.projectseagrass.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Template-Website-Images-Landscape.mp4 The Seagrass Hug planting design has been aligned with seagrass planting being undertaken by our partners at The Seagrass Consortium and has been replicated as part of restoration efforts in the Bay of Arcachon, Etang de Berre, the Bay of Santander, Oosterschelde in the Netherlands, North Wales and the Mediterranean Sea at Mallorca. Monitoring of these experimental plots including seagrass traits and environmental parameters will enable us to assess whether this approach provides protection for the emerging seeds. Scaling the trial in collaboration with international partners helps to build our collective knowledge. Results will be published and shared on SeagrassRestorer to share the findings openly and foster further collaboration within the seagrass community. A seagrass transplant prepared for planting as part of a Seagrass Hug in the Isle of Wight. Photo credit Francesca Page Spring 2025 planting efforts using the Seagrass Hug method. Photo credit Francesca Page
The Ocean is in crisis. Coral reefs are bleaching, seagrass meadows are vanishing, mangroves are being cleared, and biodiversity is plummeting. Scientists estimate we’ve already lost up to 50% of global saltmarshes, 35% of mangroves, and 20% of seagrasses. Yet alongside this sobering decline, momentum for marine restoration has never been greater. The United Nations’ Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) and the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework both set ambitious targets: restoring 30% of degraded ecosystems, including those underwater, by 2030. So the question is: if the will, the science, and the funding are building, what’s holding us back? According to a team of 25 scientists and practitioners from 18 countries, one of the biggest obstacles isn’t just the technical challenge of restoration itself, it’s the licensing and regulation systems designed to govern it. In their recent paper, Rethinking Marine Restoration Permitting to Urgently Advance Efforts, they argue that outdated, overly complex permitting processes are unintentionally slowing down the very projects needed to restore the oceans. Marine Restoration Is Still Young Unlike reforestation on land, which has centuries of trial and error behind it, marine restoration is still in its infancy. Early projects in kelp, oysters, and seagrass go back decades, but systematic science-based restoration is relatively new. Failures are common, often because methods are untested or ecological dynamics are poorly understood. But those failures are not a reason to stop—they are opportunities to learn. Unfortunately, knowledge sharing is patchy, with unsuccessful projects often going unreported. This means mistakes are repeated instead of avoided. When Regulation Backfires No one disputes that regulations are essential to protect fragile ecosystems. But the paper highlights a paradox: the very laws meant to safeguard marine environments can also block or delay restoration. Permitting processes are frequently designed for terrestrial development projects, not marine habitat recovery. This mismatch means approvals are expensive, slow, and sometimes impossible to obtain. For instance, restoration within marine protected areas is often heavily restricted, even when the activity would clearly benefit the marine ecosystems and its biodiversity. The result? Practitioners may choose suboptimal sites just to avoid regulatory headaches, or abandon projects altogether. In some cases, frustrated groups even take matters into their own hands through “covert restoration,” risking legal trouble to get reefs or seagrasses replanted. Why “Business as Usual” Won’t Work Complicating matters further is climate change. Even if the world manages to stay under the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement, marine ecosystems face enormous risks. Marine heatwaves, shifting species ranges, and rising seas mean that simply recreating past habitats is no longer realistic. Instead, the authors argue for a forward-looking approach: restoration must aim to create resilient ecosystems for the future, not replicas of the past. That may involve controversial tools like assisted gene flow, assisted migration, or even repurposing invasive species to provide ecological functions. While these approaches raise ethical questions, the authors stress that clinging to outdated baselines is more dangerous than carefully exploring new ones. The Case for Innovation “Sandpits” One of the paper’s most intriguing proposals is the creation of innovation sandpits, dedicated spaces where scientists and practitioners can test new restoration methods under flexible permitting conditions. The idea is to encourage creativity and experimentation, similar to the culture of innovation that drove the U.S. “moonshot” program. Such sandpits could allow restoration at meaningful scales, where failures are expected but also monitored and shared, building collective knowledge. Crucially, this would need to be done with free, prior, and informed consent from local communities, ensuring equity and transparency. Scaling Up Takes Time Another bottleneck is time. Most restoration permits are short-term, three to five years at most. But successful marine recovery often requires decades of continuous effort. Seagrass meadows, oyster reefs, and mangrove forests don’t mature overnight. Short permits create interruptions, forcing projects to restart and making funding insecure. For large-scale recovery, licensing must align with ecological realities: long-term horizons, continuity, and scale. Small, scattered projects will never be enough. Strategic national and international coordination is needed to identify suitable areas, streamline approvals, and pool resources. Equity and Responsibility The paper also highlights the importance of equity. Restoration is not just about biodiversity; it directly impacts the people who live alongside these ecosystems. Indigenous communities, local fishers, and coastal residents must have a say in how projects are planned and implemented. Otherwise, well-meaning initiatives could unintentionally restrict access to resources or sideline traditional knowledge. The authors emphasise that urgency must not become an excuse for ignoring equity. Social inclusion, fairness, and justice are essential for lasting success. Six Steps Toward Better Restoration Licensing The authors conclude with a six-point agenda for change: Embrace novelty: Use innovative tools (genetics, assisted migration, new technologies) to prepare for future conditions, not past baselines. Establish sandpits: Create safe zones for testing and scaling new methods. Strategic restoration zones: Designate areas where permits are streamlined and projects are protected from future disturbance. Transparent reporting: Mandate open sharing of successes and failures, so the whole field can learn. Streamlined, long-term permits: Align licensing with ecological timescales and assume restoration is a positive activity by default. Remove fees, add incentives: Instead of charging for permits, reward landowners and stakeholders who enable restoration. Looking Ahead Marine restoration has the potential to be a cornerstone of the “blue revolution” needed to sustain life on Earth. But to succeed, governments, regulators, scientists, and communities must rethink how we design the systems that enable it. As the authors argue, the goal is not deregulation, but smarter, more adaptive regulation. The ocean is changing rapidly, and restoration must change with it. By fostering innovation, embracing uncertainty, and prioritising resilience and equity, we can give our seas a fighting chance.
Posidonia seagrass meadows, veritable underwater forests, play a major ecological role. Under constant pressure from human activity, scientists are looking for ways to ensure their survival, in particular by carrying out restoration campaigns. A study conducted by the University of Liège at the marine and oceanographical research station STARESO (Calvi, Corsica) reveals that the transplantation method directly influences the root microbiome, which is essential for the survival of the plants. These results pave the way for more effective and sustainable restoration techniques. The paper is published in the journal Environmental Microbiome. Roots growing on a Posidonia cutting transplanted using metal staples. Arnaud Boulenger conditioning Posidonia roots for genetic analysis of the microbiome. Credit: University of Liège, Arnaud Boulenger Often compared to terrestrial forests, Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows form off the coast of the Mediterranean. These ecosystems act as environmental sentinels, stabilizing the seabed, storing carbon, and harboring exceptional biodiversity. Unfortunately, scientists have been observing a decline in their population for many years due to coastal urbanization, boat anchoring, and climate change. To halt this decline, researchers are experimenting with transplanting cuttings. “Until now, efforts have focused mainly on their visible survival, i.e., root recovery and leaf growth,” explains Arnaud Boulenger, a Ph.D. candidate in oceanography at ULiège (Belgium). “However, the study we conducted at STARESO reveals that the health of seagrass beds also depends on an invisible network of microorganisms associated with the roots.” It is therefore not enough to simply replant the seagrass meadows; we must also ensure the good health of their microbiome. By testing three transplantation techniques—metal staples, coconut fiber mats and potato starch structures—the team showed that the choice of substrate profoundly changed the composition of the microbiome. “Staples, which allow direct contact with the sediment, promote the establishment of key bacteria such as Chromatiales and Desulfobacterales, which are essential for the sulfur and nitrogen cycles,” the researcher explains. “Conversely, the other methods delay this beneficial colonization.” Scientists highlight that restoration methods must now incorporate this microbiological dimension, as these bacteria play a direct role in plant resilience. “These results are groundbreaking,” says Sylvie Gobert, oceanographer. “This is the first time that a study has demonstrated in situ the importance of the microbiome in the success of Posidonia transplantation. The results we have obtained open up concrete perspectives, such as the inoculation of beneficial bacteria or the design of supports that facilitate root-sediment interaction.” Restoring a seagrass bed is therefore much more than just replanting cuttings underwater. It means recreating an entire ecosystem, both visible and invisible, in which bacteria play a crucial role. As Boulenger sums it up, “it’s a bit like replanting a forest, while also ensuring that the soil that nourishes it is brought back to life.” More information: This article is republished from PHYS.ORG and provided by the University of Liège. Arnaud Boulenger et al, Microbiome matters: how transplantation methods and donor origins shape the successful restoration of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica, Environmental Microbiome (2025). DOI: 10.1186/s40793-025-00764-9
Dr Richard Unsworth, Chief Scientific Officer at Project Seagrass, along with 35 other leading scientists from across the UK, responds to proposals from the UK government to make licensing for marine restoration more complex and costly. Dear Rt Hon Steve Reed OBE MP and team, This letter sets out our response as leading scientists, practitioners, and NGOs to the DEFRA consultation “Marine licences: changes to fees, exemptions and self-service licences”. We believe the proposed increases in fees and restrictions for marine licences will seriously undermine restoration efforts, making an already difficult activity even more challenging and, in many cases, unviable. The current licensing system for marine restoration is already unjust and fundamentally at odds with the UK Government’s national and international commitments. To introduce additional fees, administrative burdens, and restrictions at this time is, quite frankly, perverse. We specifically oppose: Any increase in fees for marine restoration licences. The urgent need is to remove fees entirely, not add to them. Further restrictions and additional charges on marine restoration projects larger than 5 hectares (we need marine restoration exemptions from this). Evidence clearly shows that scaling up restoration delivers greater resilience and enhanced ecosystem service (natural capital) benefits compared with small, fragmented projects. We specifically request: Practitioners need DEFRA to create a simplified, consistent, cost-free, and science-based licensing system for marine and coastal conservation. Currently, licensing is one of the most significant barriers to restoring the health of the UK’s seas. We see these proposed changes under the consultation as a missed opportunity to create such a system. The urgency could not be greater. Our climate and natural systems are breaking down, and the ocean is in crisis. In each of the last three summers (2023–2025), UK seas have endured unprecedented marine heatwaves. Never before has there been such a critical need for healthy coastal ecosystems that can bolster resilience, buffer climate impacts, and support food security. Yet our habitats have been decimated and continue to decline with DEFRA’s own assessment concluding that the UK marine environment is failing on 13 out of 15 indicators. Marine restoration is not optional; it is essential for our collective future. Restoring and conserving ocean habitats is also a legal obligation. The UK is a signatory to the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and, under the Environment Act 2021, has binding targets for nature recovery. These commitments require all public bodies, including seabed owners to conserve and enhance biodiversity. The UK has already missed the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, largely due to regulatory barriers of the very kind now being proposed. Repeating these mistakes would be indefensible. The benefits of a streamlined licensing system are profound. It would enhance our capacity to tackle the climate and biodiversity crises, strengthen coastal resilience, and improve national food security. International examples demonstrate that simplified frameworks accelerate recovery and generate long-term ecological and social benefits. At conferences such as ReMeMaRe, UKSS, and the Seascape Conference, frustration with England’s current licensing regime has been a recurring theme. The system is widely regarded as unpredictable, inconsistent, costly, and burdensome, treating restoration projects as if they damage rather than enhance the marine environment. This not only delays urgent work but risks deterring vital investment in ocean recovery. The state of our marine environment illustrates the scale of the problem: estuaries are degraded, mudflats retreating, saltmarshes fragmented, and most seagrass meadows lost. Remaining habitats are scarce and highly vulnerable to climate change. Immediate reform is essential. Wales and Scotland are already moving in the right direction. Dialogue and regulatory reforms are creating enabling environments for restoration. England must now do the same. Without urgent change, regulation will remain a barrier to the large-scale environmental renewal that is desperately needed. We no longer have healthy ecosystems to use as restoration baselines. Historic habitats such as oyster reefs have vanished, while global heating accelerates ecological change. Restoration must therefore look forward, building climate-resilient ecosystems that reflect future needs rather than only past states. To do so, we need a legal and regulatory framework that supports ambition. The Kunming–Montreal Framework and the Environment Act 2021 require bold action, but these targets cannot be met without enabling legislation. In addition to the consequences of further restrictions on marine restoration for biodiversity, we also believe these restrictions place further restrictions upon our ability to reach Net Zero, and therefore see this as an issue not only for DEFRA but also for DESNZ. We therefore call on the Government to act swiftly to reform the licensing system for marine and coastal restoration. This is a practical and achievable step that would deliver immediate benefits for biodiversity, climate resilience, and food security. As scientists and practitioners at the forefront of UK marine research and restoration, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and your team to discuss solutions and pathways for progress. Yours sincerely, Dr Richard Unsworth FRSB, FHEA Associate Professor (Swansea University), Chief Scientific Officer (Project Seagrass) Signed on behalf of the following: Prof Martin J Attrill, Professor of Marine Ecology, University of Plymouth Dr Dan Barrios-O’Neill, Head of Marine Conservation, Cornwall Wildlife Trust Prof Michael Chadwick, King’s College London Sarah Chatfield, Nature Recovery Partnership Manager, Chichester Harbour Conservancy Dr Leanne Cullen-Unsworth, Chief Executive, Project Seagrass Dr Aline da Silva Cerqueira, Sussex Bay & King’s College London Dr Tim Ferrero, Senior Specialist – Hampshire & Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Zia Fikardos, Marine Policy Officer, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) Angus Garbutt, Principal Scientist, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Chris Graham, Head of Ocean Regeneration, Marine Conservation Society Tom Godfrey, Founder, Earth Change Dr Ian Hendy, Coastal Ecologist, Senior Lecturer, University of Portsmouth Chloë James, Seagrass Project Officer, Cornwall Wildlife Trust Prof Chris Laing, University of Exeter Dr Sally Little, Nottingham Trent University Louise MacCallum, Solent Seascape Project Manager, Blue Marine Foundation Niall McGrath, CEO, Robocean Ltd. Anouska Mendzil, Senior Science Officer, Project Seagrass & Swansea University Nigel Mortimer, Estuaries Officer, South Devon National Landscape Estuaries Partnership Dr Simon J. Pittman, School of Geography
Earlier this year, Project Seagrass welcomed Rhys Bowen to the team to support our work in North Wales as part of the Seagrass Ocean Rescue North Wales programme. This follows on from Rhys’ involvement in the programme during 2024 where we worked as one of the Marine Futures Interns at our Seagrass Ocean Rescue partner, the North Wales Wildlife Trust. Rhys splits his time between Project Seagrass and North Wales Wildlife Trust. In this blog article Rhys reflects on recent seagrass monitoring he has been involved with in North Wales: Over the past few months, I’ve had the privilege of monitoring several key seagrass meadows and restoration sites across North Wales. These meadows, both old and new, play a vital role in our national marine conservation efforts. Seagrass Watch at Porthdinllaen, Llyn Peninsula In May, with the help of Dylan and Reece from North Wales Wildlife Trust, I conducted monitoring at our longstanding seed donor site in Porthdinllaen. We used the internationally recognised Seagrass Watch protocol which has been implemented at this meadow since 2015 and follows a rigorous, standardised approach. Using 50 cm² quadrats along three fixed transects, I collected data every 5 meters on: Seagrass cover. Epiphyte and algal presence. Average leaf lengths. This consistent monitoring at the same locations allows us to track changes in seagrass health over time and helps inform both conservation and restoration strategies. Seagrass meadow at Porthdinllaen. Photo Credit Rhys Bowen Project Seagrass Seagrass Watch monitoring at Porthdinllaen. Photo Credit Rhys Bowen Project Seagrass Restoration Efforts on Ynys Môn (Anglesey) As the Seagrass Ocean Rescue programme entered its fourth year, we continue to strive towards our goal to plant Zostera marina over an area of ten hectares across North Wales between 2022 and 2026. This year, at Penrhos and Penrhyn on Anglesey, we planted nearly 1 million seagrass seeds using two methods: The DIS (Dispenser Injection Seeding) technique. A manually powered seeding machine, developed by The Fieldwork Company designed to efficiently distribute mud-seed mixtures over large areas. Both methods have proved effective and the machine quickly won fans among our volunteers! Of which, none of this would be possible without the incredible support from our community groups, dedicated local volunteers, and the amazing Ocean Rescue Champions at the North Wales Wildlife Trust. Massive thanks to everyone who braved the weather and mud with us! As someone who is new to restoration, it was eye-opening to be a part of this ongoing work and witness the precision and care that goes into giving these tiny seeds the best chance of developing into healthy adult plants and meadows. First Signs of Growth In late June over the spring tides, I returned to Holyhead Bay with volunteers to assess the seagrass we had planted out in spring. We used 1m² quadrats to count seagrass shoots and measure leaf length and epiphyte coverage withing our planting plots. Following this period of monitoring I’m thrilled to report: Seagrass is growing across nearly all our planted plots. Shoots from both planting methods (DIS and Seeding machine) have emerged. Some leaves have already reached lengths of 12 cm and appear healthy. Monitoring will continue throughout the year alongside collection of environmental data. This will continue to inform and support our restoration work. The Seagrass Ocean Rescue team would like to thank the partners and volunteers for their continued support. Keep an eye out for more opportunities to get involved by signing up to our newsletter! Seagrass Watch Monitoring in Porthdinllaen
Gathaagudu/Shark Bay is located on Malgana (pronounced Mal-guh-nuh) Country. It’s a place of great natural beauty and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The landscape is a stunning array of colors as the desert meets the ocean. Below the sea’s surface, 4,000 square kilometers of seagrass meadows sway. That’s equivalent to 226 AFL footy fields. The Shark Bay Heritage Area is home to 12 of the world’s 72 seagrass species. Unfortunately, more than a quarter of the seagrass died during the 2010/11 marine heat wave. To restore the seagrass, a deep knowledge of the area and its plants are needed as well as scientific tools for genetic testing. Malgana mob brought their knowledge and UWA researchers brought their tools. Together, they’re bringing the wirriya jalyanu back to life. A deep connection Malgana people have a 30,000-year connection with Gathaagudu. They have a deep knowledge of Country and are passionate about looking after the area. Aunty Pat is a Malgana Gantharri/Elder. She says Gathaagudu is paradise. “If we look after Country, Country will look after us,” says Aunty Pat. Malgana people had known Sea Country was changing for a long time. “The fishermen knew it,” says Aunty Pat. “Fishermen know Sea Country better than anyone. You talk to any of those fishermen and they will tell you stories about the changes in biology and the marine environment.” UNESCO only recognizes Gathaagudu as an important ecological site, not a cultural site. “We’re trying to [get] our cultural values listed alongside our natural values,” says Aunty Pat. “They’re of equal importance.” These cultural values and knowledge are key to the wirriya jalyanu restoration to provide a broader historical context of Sea Country in Gathaagudu. Teamwork Dr. Elizabeth Sinclair is an Adjunct Senior Research Fellow at UWA. She worked with Aunty Pat and Malgana Traditional Owners to restore the seagrass. Sinclair says researchers have been working on the seagrass for around 15 years. Seagrass grows extremely well in Gathaagudu because the bay area is very shallow, has a sandy bottom and has no big ocean swells. The main seagrass disturbance is dugongs feeding on it. When seagrass is gone, the sandy floor is left exposed to tides. The sand shifts a lot, making the water cloudy. With sand constantly moving, it’s difficult for new plants to grow. This creates a system that’s hard to reverse. “By the time the heat wave came along and in the following years, it was clear that parts of the seagrass meadow were not going to recover naturally and they needed a bit of help,” says Sinclair. Sinclair and the research team looked at genetic markers in the seagrass DNA to understand how the population was structured and how to best restore it. Dugong in a seagrass meadow. Credit: via SeagrassWatch Distribution There are two large species of seagrass that grow on Gathaagudu Sea Country: ribbon weed and wire weed. These plants can grow up to 2 meters tall, creating an underwater forest and crucial habitat for marine life. Growing different types of seagrass requires different strategies. Ribbon weed grows like lawn, with new shoots emerging from the sand. “If you stick your head underwater, all you see is the green shoots,” says Sinclair. “You don’t see [a] massive network of roots.” In Gathaagudu, most of the ribbon weed is one giant clone that is 180 kilometers long. That’s longer than the drive from Perth to Bunbury. It’s the largest known plant on Earth. Knowing how the seagrass is genetically connected informs how the team approaches restoring the meadow. Wire weed grows entire seedlings that break off and float around until they land in the sand. This distribution strategy means wire weed has much more genetic diversity spread further around the bay. “We have the genetics to understand how the plants are related and then we use that information to figure out which plants to collect and where to grow them,” says Sinclair. Underwater gardening The Malgana rangers were heavily involved in the restoration process. “Rangers collected a lot of the restoration material because some now have dive tickets,” says Sinclair. “If you’re working in really shallow water, you can do it on a snorkel, but it’s much easier to do it on scuba.” To collect ribbon weed, rangers would take 10–15cm cuttings. These could be replanted and held in place with a U-shaped piece of wire for about 6 months until they grew new roots. For the wire weed restoration, the team collected seedlings and replanted them at a new location. Instead of being secured with wire, they would hang onto snaggers, a “sand-filled sausage” with a hessian coating. The hessian provided an anchor for the wire weed seedlings to attach to. Aunty Pat says the rangers loved working with the research team because it was a meaningful way to care for Country. “They couldn’t get enough of it,” says Aunty Pat. “To be working in a trial like that, they learned so much. They were happy to be doing something that was meaningful.” Ribbon weed meadow. Credit: Rachel Austin via UWA ‘Medicine for us’ Opportunities for Malgana people to return to Country are few and far between. They can’t participate on a regular basis because of a housing shortage at Gathaagudu. “The Malgana Aboriginal Corporation currently have several rangers in the program, unfortunately everyone has to rely on staying with family or friends who live in Gathaagudu because there isn’t enough accommodation due to the housing crisis,” says Aunty Pat. These types of partnerships enable Malgana people to work on Country and the younger generation the chance to reconnect to the land. “It helps them with their healing [and] their cultural and personal identity,” says Aunty Pat. Restoration team filling seagrass ‘snaggers.’ Credit: Gary Kendrick, UWA Shared knowledge “Shared knowledge leads to an improved understanding of our environment,” says Sinclair. “As Western researchers, we come in, look at a site and focus on one little thing … We have fairly narrowly focused research areas. When you start talking with Traditional Owners,
