Tag: new science

Blades of Enhalus acoroides stand upright in the water.

Mapping Indonesian seagrass quality to target blue carbon conservation

Not all of Indonesia’s seagrass meadows are faring alike. A study has revealed substantial spatial differences in the condition of 21 seagrass meadows across central and eastern Indonesia, providing a clearer picture of where ecosystems are thriving (hotspots), under stress (coldspots) or undergoing ecological change (outliers). But why does this

Read More »
A shoal of parrotfish swim through a seagrass meadow

Seagrass meadows could help nourish millions, new study finds

New research finds that seagrass meadows support fish that can be more valuable for human nutrition than fish found on coral reefs   Seagrass meadows play a majorly overlooked role in providing nutrition for coastal communities, a new study published in Cell Reports Sustainability has uncovered. The study, led by

Read More »
Juvenile señorita (Oxyjulis californica) utilize the protective canopy of the open-coast seagrass restoration site at Button Shell, Catalina Island.

Catalina Island study highlights open-coast seagrass restoration success

New research led by scientists at University of California’s San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography is shining a spotlight on one of the ocean’s most overlooked habitats: seagrass. Led by Scripps Oceanography Ph.D. candidate Rilee Sanders, the study documented the first successful restoration of open-coast seagrass (common eelgrass). The findings offer

Read More »
Blades of Enhalus acoroides stand upright in the water.

Mapping Indonesian seagrass quality to target blue carbon conservation

Not all of Indonesia’s seagrass meadows are faring alike. A study has revealed substantial spatial differences in the condition of 21 seagrass meadows across central and eastern Indonesia, providing a clearer picture of where ecosystems are thriving (hotspots), under stress (coldspots) or undergoing ecological change (outliers). But why does this matter? Indonesia, a global seagrass hotspot, is home to more than 660,000 hectares (1.6 million acres) of seagrass meadows that provide habitat for marine life, support fisheries, store carbon and protect coastlines. However, these ecosystems face growing pressures from human activities and environmental change, while their ecological condition can vary considerably across the country’s diverse coastal regions. Assessing these differences remains challenging, particularly where long-term monitoring data are limited. To address this shortcoming, a team of researchers from several Indonesian institutions, led by Rohani Ambo-Rappe, a professor in the Department of Marine Science at Hasanuddin University, quantified the Seagrass Ecological Quality Index (SEQI). The framework integrates key biophysical and environmental indicators to provide a detailed spatial assessment of seagrass ecological quality across central and eastern Indonesia, helping identify areas where conservation or restoration efforts could be prioritized. Their work was published in Science of The Total Environment. Graphical abstract. Credit: Science of The Total Environment Building a spatial quality index “We developed the SEQI framework using five ecological indicators, including seagrass species richness, seagrass cover, water clarity, macroalgae cover, and epiphyte cover,” Ambo-Rappe said. “We combined the index with spatial and multivariate analyses to understand how ecological conditions varied among sites.” The assessment revealed substantial variation in seagrass condition, with SEQI values ranging from 0.39 to 0.88. Some of the highest values were recorded at Pasi-Gusung, Parak and Maharayya, where seagrass meadows had high species richness, relatively extensive cover and clear water. In contrast, Lae-Lae recorded the lowest SEQI value, reflecting very low seagrass cover and species richness, alongside reduced water clarity. The researchers found that these differences were not randomly distributed. In central Indonesia, seagrass ecological quality formed a spatial mosaic of hotspots, coldspots and ecological outliers. Hotspots, coldspots and refuges High-quality “hotspots” were identified at sites including Pasi-Gusung, Liukangloe, Maharayya and Parak, where healthy conditions were reinforced by similarly healthy surrounding areas. Such locations can benefit from conservation to maintain existing ecological resilience. In contrast, several locations identified as “coldspots” were characterized by degraded ecosystems. These areas included Sekotong, Lanjukang, Badi-Alami, Badi-Restorasi, Waboela and Lapandewa, where restoration or measures to reduce environmental pressures may be particularly important. The analysis also revealed sites with contrasting conditions relative to their surroundings, identified as spatial “outliers.” Areas such as Bone Batang and Barrang Lompo contained relatively healthy ecosystems within less healthy surroundings, potentially making them vulnerable ecological refugia requiring protection. Meanwhile, Lae-Lae and Bonto Bahari represented degraded sites embedded within healthier seagrass systems, suggesting opportunities for targeted restoration. Guiding protection and restoration Seagrass conservation policies cannot rely on a one-size-fits-all approach. This unique ecological mosaic of seagrass meadows in Indonesia, a patchwork of ecological conditions, highlights the importance of considering spatial context when managing seagrass ecosystems. Rather than treating each meadow in isolation, identifying ecological clusters and outliers can help conservation practitioners pinpoint where protection, restoration or targeted interventions could have the greatest impact. By identifying healthy seagrass ecosystems that can be prioritized for conservation and degraded areas where targeted restoration may be needed, the research can help inform efforts to protect marine biodiversity and strengthen the role of seagrass meadows as blue carbon reservoirs. These findings also advance the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 14 (Life Below Water). Collectively, the findings offer a practical basis for prioritizing conservation and restoration efforts. “Our study provides a spatially informed framework to identify areas to protect, restore or buffer. It can guide actionable conservation priorities before further degradation makes recovery more difficult,” Ambo-Rappe said. Publication Details Rohani Ambo-Rappe et al, Spatial–multivariate modelling of seagrass ecological quality index (SEQI) in Central to Eastern Indonesia, Science of The Total Environment (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181904 More information: This article is republished from Phys.org and was provided by Hasanuddin University.

Read More »
A boat is moored close to seagrass.

3D-printed bioplastic pods offer new hope for seagrass restoration in Thailand

A new collaborative research project between Murdoch University and Walailak University (WU) aims to restore seagrass meadows in Thailand using 3D-printed pods made from bioplastics. The seagrass meadows around Koh Lidi, a pair of islands inside Mu Ko Phetra National Park in Satun Province, are a nursery for shrimp, crabs, and fish that sustain nearby coastal fishing communities. Seagrass is also the primary food source of Thailand’s declining dugong population. In recent years, unprecedented numbers of dugongs have washed up dead along Thailand’s Andaman Coast as seagrass meadows have been lost due to a range of environmental pressures. Seagrass restoration efforts in the area are often thwarted, as young shoots are washed away, buried in sediment, or eaten by marine life before their roots can establish. The project is being undertaken by Walailak University Ph.D. candidates Patsakorn Jeenchuay and Leoniel Jude Giray under the supervision of Professor Mullica Jaroensutasinee and Professor Krisanadej Jaroensutasinee, directors of WU’s Centre of Excellence for Ecoinformatics, in collaboration with Dr. Alexandra Gulizia and Professor Andrew Macrae from Murdoch University’s Bioplastics Innovation Hub (BIH). Biodegradable seagrass pod design. Credit Walailak University By designing and installing 3D-printed biodegradable pods, the project aims to protect young seagrass transplants and increase their survival rates. BIH Deputy Director Professor Macrae, who spent more than two decades working on mangrove restoration in Brazil, said restoration efforts generally fail for a variety of reasons. “One of the biggest challenges in seagrass restoration is helping young plants survive long enough to establish roots,” Professor Macrae said. “These biodegradable pods are designed to protect transplants from waves, sediment movement and grazing animals during those critical early stages.” The biodegradable prototype features a protective dome-and-anchor design that is inserted into the seabed with a seagrass shoot enclosed inside. The dome has structural slots in its sides, allowing roots to grow outward, while the plant is shielded from crabs, fish, and turtles until it can fend for itself. Made from a bioplastic called polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), the dome is designed to completely biodegrade once the plant is established. Field trials of biodegradable seagrass pod. Credit Murdoch University “The bioplastic is produced through bacterial fermentation using locally sourced microbial strains in Western Australia,” Gulizia said. “By tailoring the material’s properties, we can create a pod that’s durable enough to withstand marine conditions while remaining fully biodegradable.” The PHA required for the project can be produced at Murdoch University’s BIH and at the Joint Laboratory of Waste and the Circular Economy (WACE) at Naresuan University in Thailand. This month, Murdoch’s Professor Macrae, Gulizia and Dr. Samantha Vijjoen visited Koh Lidi to survey the site and meet with the Thai research team. The pods remain at the prototype stage and are undergoing safety and packaging testing before field trials commence. Leading seagrass expert Professor Jennifer Verduin, Murdoch University’s pro vice chancellor for the College of Environmental and Life Sciences, will provide expert guidance and mentorship throughout the project. “If successful, this technology could provide a scalable and environmentally friendly solution for restoring seagrass ecosystems across Southeast Asia and other coastal regions facing similar challenges,” Professor Verduin said. More information: This article is republished from Phys.org

Read More »
Ruppia maritima

A resilient native seagrass species could help reshape coastal restoration

Seagrasses are among the most important foundation species in coastal ecosystems, providing habitat for marine life, stabilising sediments, and helping improve water quality. Yet nearly 20% of the world’s historic seagrass cover has been lost, and efforts to restore these vital underwater meadows often face significant challenges. In Florida’s Indian River Lagoon (IRL), widespread seagrass losses following harmful algal blooms have left many areas with little natural recovery. Now, researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute have identified a resilient native seagrass species that could offer a new approach to restoring degraded estuarine habitats. The study, published in Regional Studies in Marine Science, provides new insight into the life history and potential restoration applications of Ruppia maritima, a relatively uncommon seagrass in the IRL that has persisted in some of the lagoon’s most environmentally altered areas, including mosquito impoundments that can be especially challenging to seagrass while also offering a promising study environment. They are hydrologically altered wetlands separated from the lagoon by dikes and water-control structures. Seasonal reconnection through Rotational Impoundment Management creates fluctuating water levels and water quality, making these systems challenging environments for seagrasses. At the same time, they offer a unique setting to study how R. maritima withstands repeated disturbance and what makes the species potentially valuable for restoration. Ruppia maritima were transplanted into aquaculture tanks at the FAU Harbor Branch Seagrass Nursery to evaluate their growth, reproduction and potential for nursery cultivation. Credit FAU Harbor Branch To investigate, researchers followed R. maritima from the field to the laboratory and nursery. Over three years, they monitored naturally occurring populations at two sites within Bee Gum Point Nature Preserve, tracking seasonal changes in seagrass coverage, biomass and environmental conditions. They also examined the sediment seed bank and conducted laboratory experiments to determine which conditions trigger seed germination. In addition, plants collected from the preserve were transplanted into aquaculture tanks at the FAU Harbor Branch Seagrass Nursery to evaluate their growth, reproduction and potential for nursery cultivation. Results revealed that R. maritima follows a distinctive annual life cycle, growing primarily from late winter through spring, flowering and then dying back during summer. Despite seasonal flooding and deteriorating water quality, the population returned year after year. Researchers found the key beneath the sediment: a persistent seed bank that survived unfavorable conditions and regenerated when conditions improved, with laboratory experiments showing that lower salinity, particularly freshwater exposure, strongly stimulated germination. “Ruppia maritima has a remarkable ability to persist through disturbance,” said Rachel Brewton, Ph.D., senior author and an assistant research professor at FAU Harbor Branch. “Even when the plants disappear above ground, the population can persist as a seed bank in the sediment, waiting for conditions to become favorable.” Ruppia maritima from Bee Gum Point Nature Preserve. Credit FAU Harbor Branch The species demonstrated similar resilience in cultivation. Transplanted R. maritima established successfully in aquaculture tanks at FAU’s seagrass nursery, following a seasonal growth pattern similar to the wild population and producing viable seeds. Most notably, the cultivated population has remained self-sustaining in the nursery since its establishment in 2021. “That ability to regenerate from a persistent seed bank, combined with its successful cultivation in our seagrass nursery, is what makes this species particularly interesting from a restoration perspective,” said Richard Mulroy, study co-author and biological scientist at FAU Harbor Branch. The results suggest that R. maritima may serve as a useful pioneer species in IRL restoration—one capable of rapidly colonizing bare or disturbed areas and potentially helping create conditions for broader seagrass recovery. “Rather than simply replacing established seagrass communities, we see potential for Ruppia maritima to help initiate recovery in places where habitat has been lost,” said Deanna Webber, primary study author and research coordinator at FAU Harbor Branch. “Its ability to come back from seed after periods of environmental stress suggests it may be useful for disturbed systems where conditions are not always predictable.” The findings also support further exploration of seed-based restoration as a potentially useful strategy. During laboratory trials, R. maritima seeds remained viable during prolonged exposure to high salinity and germinated after freshwater exposure, suggesting that seeds could potentially be collected, stored and propagated before being introduced into restoration sites. The next step is field testing to determine where and how R. maritima performs best. Researchers will evaluate aquaculture-derived plants and seed-based approaches under natural conditions and identify the environmental conditions, planting methods and restoration goals for which the species provides the greatest benefit. “The goal of restoration is not simply to put seagrass back—it is to create the conditions for a functioning ecosystem to recover,” Brewton said. “If future field trials confirm what we are seeing in the laboratory, nursery and natural populations, Ruppia maritima could give restoration practitioners another tool for rebuilding seagrass habitat in the Indian River Lagoon and potentially other disturbed estuaries around the world.” More information: This article is republished from Phys.org Read the research paper here: Deanna F. Webber et al, Ecology and restoration potential of Ruppia maritima in a managed mosquito impoundment of the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA, Regional Studies in Marine Science (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2026.105271

Read More »
A shoal of parrotfish swim through a seagrass meadow

Seagrass meadows could help nourish millions, new study finds

New research finds that seagrass meadows support fish that can be more valuable for human nutrition than fish found on coral reefs   Seagrass meadows play a majorly overlooked role in providing nutrition for coastal communities, a new study published in Cell Reports Sustainability has uncovered. The study, led by researchers at Project Seagrass and Stockholm University found that fish living in seagrass meadows can provide a richer mix of essential nutrients than fish living on nearby coral reefs. Coral reefs are famous for supporting large numbers of fish. But this new study reveals that seagrass meadows may be equally important, and in some cases even more important, for the fish that people actually catch and eat. The research team studied fish from 20 seagrass meadows and 20 coral reefs along a 3,000km stretch of coastline between Kenya and Mozambique. They investigated the presence of six key nutrients that people need to stay healthy – calcium, iron, zinc, selenium, vitamin A, and omega-3 fatty acids – within the fish found along this stretch of coastline. Instead of looking at each nutrient one by one, the scientists instead treated fish more like natural multivitamins. “Fish don’t nourish people one nutrient at a time,” said Dr Benjamin Jones, who carried out the research as a PhD student at Stockholm University and is now Chief Conservation Officer at Project Seagrass. “They come as a package. A single fish contains iron, zinc, calcium, selenium, vitamin A, and omega-3s. We wanted to understand which habitats produce fish with the best mix of these nutrients.” After accounting for differences in fish biomass, the team found that seagrass fish communities were, on average, 1.6 times more nutritionally rich than coral reef fish communities. The difference was even larger when the team focused on the fish species most often caught by fishers in East Africa. For the top three most important food fish species, nutrient support was over 8 times higher in seagrass meadows than coral reefs. Two important food fish prized in the region, rabbitfish and parrotfish, were also far more common in seagrass meadows. In terms of biomass, they were 5 times and 65 times more abundant in seagrass than on coral reefs. “We know that coral reefs have more fish overall, but seagrass meadows had more of the fish that really matter for local food,” said Dr Jones. “This changes how we should think about these habitats. Seagrass isn’t just a fish nursery, nor just a carbon stock, it’s food infrastructure, nature’s own supermarket.” Four rabbitfish in seagrass. Photo credit: Ben Jones Rabbitfish in market. Ben Jones Millions of people in tropical coastal regions rely on fisheries for food and income, and many of these communities face poverty, limited livelihood options, and high risks of malnutrition. The study also found that an average seagrass fish could provide around 5% of a young child’s daily iron needs, 70% of their selenium needs, and 21% of their zinc needs highlighting the overlooked role that seagrass meadows play in supporting the health of coastal communities. The findings also challenge the way that ocean conservation is often framed. Coral reefs attract global attention, and rightly so. They are rich in biodiversity and support major fisheries. However, these important ecosystems are under severe pressure from climate change, bleaching, ocean warming, acidification, and overfishing. Seagrass meadows are also declining, especially in tropical regions, because of poor water quality, sewage pollution, coastal development, sediment runoff, and physical damage. Yet they receive far less attention and funding despite the wealth of benefits they provide. The authors argue that this must change. “If we lose seagrass meadows, we are not just losing habitat,” said Dr Jones. “We may be losing a source of nutrition for millions of people who need it most.” The study argues that seagrass should not replace coral reefs in conservation priorities. Instead, it shows that the two habitats do different jobs and need equal attention. Coral reefs support more fish biomass. Seagrass meadows provide reliable access to key food fish that can contain a powerful mix of nutrients. “Reefs and seagrass meadows work together,” said Dr Jones. “If we want coastal fisheries to feed people, we need to protect the whole seascape.” The researchers say that protecting seagrass for food security will require more than drawing boundaries in the sea. Most threats to seagrass come from land. Better sewage treatment, cleaner rivers, reduced sediment runoff, improved farming practices, and locally fair fisheries management are all needed to ensure the protection of our remaining seagrass meadows. They also warn that seagrass conservation must not ignore the people who depend on these habitats. As interest grows in protecting seagrass for blue carbon, communities must not be pushed away from fishing grounds that support their diets and livelihoods. “Seagrass conservation has to be about people as well as nature,” said Dr Jones. “These meadows store carbon, support biodiversity, and help feed millions. That makes them one of the most important ecosystems on Earth.” The message from the study is simple: secure seagrass meadows, and we help secure food and nutrition for coastal communities. Key Findings Seagrass fish communities were 1.6 times more nutritionally rich than coral reef fish communities after accounting for fish biomass and depth. For the top three regional food fish species, estimated nutrient availability was 8.4 times higher in unfished seagrass meadows than unfished coral reefs. In fished areas, predicted nutrient support from these same species was 8.8 times higher in seagrass meadows than coral reefs. Two important food fish were far more common in seagrass: Siganus sutor was 5 times higher by biomass, and Leptoscarus vaigiensis was 65 times higher by biomass. An average seagrass-associated fish could provide around 5% of a young child’s daily iron needs, 70% of selenium needs, and 21% of zinc needs. The study shows that seagrass meadows should be recognised as vital food-security habitats, not just biodiversity or carbon habitats.   The study, “Seagrass meadows sustain fish communities vital for human nutrition,” is

Read More »
Seagrass meadow shift in warming seas

Beneath seagrass meadows, a shift in warming seas could decide which underwater habitats survive

On the western side of Lake Macquarie in New South Wales, Australia, sits Myuna Bay – a quiet bay with meadows of seagrass waving beneath the water. The most common marine plant species you find there is Zostera muelleri. It has long ribbon-like leaves that grow from stems (called rhizomes) buried beneath the sediment and provides important shelter for small fish, shrimp and crabs. Although Myuna Bay looks quite normal, it is actually a bit unusual. For decades, the nearby Eraring power station released warm water into the lake that was used to cool down their systems, causing water temperatures here to be consistently 1°C to 3°C higher than nearby sites. This made the bay a rare natural laboratory for understanding what warming oceans might mean for coastal ecosystems. In our new research, published today in the journal New Phytologist, we used this setting to investigate what happens to seagrass and the microbes living in the sediment when ocean temperatures increase in the way climate models predict they will in the future. Experimental design. Sediments (intact or disrupted microbial communities via autoclaving) and seagrass (Zostera muelleri) plants (with intact or disrupted rhizosphere microbial community) were transplanted into the warm environment to test how belowground microbes affect seagrass performance under elevated ocean temperatures. Six plants (two from each of the three ambient and warm sites) were randomly placed into each pot with five replicate pots per treatment. Credit: New Phytologist (2026).   One of the most important coastal habitats   Seagrasses are often overlooked, but they are among the most important coastal habitats on Earth. They are marine flowering plants that stabilize sediments, improve water clarity and provide food and shelter for many marine animals. They also store large amounts of carbon in the sediments beneath them, making them important for slowing climate change. But seagrasses don’t function alone. Beneath the leaves, in the sediments, lives a hidden ecosystem of microbes: bacteria, fungi and other microscopic organisms that interact with the plant. Just as plants on land depend on soil microbes, seagrasses rely on microbial communities in the sediment around their roots. These microbes carry out many important processes. Some provide nutrients that plants need to grow. Others break down organic matter or detoxify harmful compounds in the sediment. In some ways, the relationship can be compared to the partnership between corals and the microscopic algae living inside them. Corals rely on those algae for energy, while seagrasses depend on microbes to help maintain a healthy environment around their roots. But not all microbes are helpful. Some produce sulfide, a compound that can be toxic to seagrass roots when it accumulates in sediments. We are starting to find out that whether microbial communities help or harm the plant can depend strongly on environmental conditions, including increases in ocean temperatures due to climate change.   Simulating future ocean warming in the field   To understand how ocean warming might affect the relationship between seagrasses and microbes in the sediment under realistic future conditions, we designed a field experiment at Myuna Bay. We collected seagrass plants and sediments from both warmer and “normal” temperature sites in Lake Macquarie. Some plants were grown in sediments with their microbial communities intact. In other treatments, the sediments were heated to 121°C to disrupt the microbes; this reduces total bacterial abundance by more than 95%. This allowed us to test how plants performed when the microbial community was intact versus when it had been disrupted. We then placed plants in pots with those different sediments and exposed the plants to warmer conditions at Myuna Bay, similar to those expected in the future. After one month, we monitored how the plants responded. We measured how they survived, how many shoots they produced and how their biomass changed over time. At the same time, we analyzed the bacterial communities in the sediment using DNA sequencing to see how they differed between treatments.   Looking beyond plants   When plants were grown in sediments from “normal” temperature sites, seagrass performed well whether the microbes were intact or disrupted. But when plants were grown in sediments from warmer sites, the outcome changed: plants growing with intact sediment microbial communities performed worse. These sediments from the warm areas also contained different bacterial communities, which may help explain the lower plant biomass we observed. One possible explanation involves sulfide. In seagrass sediments, certain microbes produce sulfide as part of their metabolism. At high concentrations, sulfide can be toxic for seagrasses. Warmer temperatures may stimulate microbial activity, increasing sulfide production and tipping the balance from a supportive microbial community to one that harms the plant. Our findings highlight an important idea: the impacts of climate change on seagrasses can’t be understood by looking at the plants alone. The microbial communities living in the sediment can also influence how these plants respond to warming. This has important implications for conservation and restoration. Around the world, seagrass meadows are declining due to coastal development, pollution and climate change. Restoration projects often focus on planting seagrass shoots or seeds. But the condition of the surrounding sediment, including its microbial community, may also determine whether restoration succeeds. As oceans continue to warm, the future of seagrass meadows may depend not only on the plants we see when snorkelling, but also on the microscopic microbes living in the sediment beneath them.   More information: This article is republished from Phys.org Read the research paper here: Ocean warming indirectly affects seagrass performance through effects on sediment microbial communities – Jongen – New Phytologist – Wiley Online Library

Read More »
A fish eye lens photo of seagrass from above water on a sunny day

Marine heat waves can create toxic relationships between seagrasses and microbes

Heat stress from marine heat waves can create a toxic relationship between seagrasses and a hidden ecosystem of bacteria, transforming a previously beneficial co-existence between marine plants and microbes into a harmful one, a University of Sydney and UNSW study has found. Seagrasses are marine flowering plants that act as fish nurseries, purify water and are crucial in coastal carbon storage. Their decline is often missed until it’s too late. The role soil microbes play in land plant health and climate resilience is well known. But for marine plants like seagrass, this science has largely been overlooked. “It’s worth paying attention to what happens in seagrass habitats as marine heat waves become more common. That information could be invaluable for conservation efforts,” said lead researcher Dr. Renske Jongen, from the School of Life and Environmental Sciences. In an underwater gardening experiment, biologists found a diverse bacterial ecosystem in the soil and around seagrass roots. The bacterial ecosystem was in a delicate balance, controlling the chemistry of the soil and seagrass health. Under increased water temperature, tiny bacteria living in the sediment among seagrass roots can reduce seagrass tolerance to climate change, stunting its growth and its ability to cope with heat stress. Higher temperatures favor bacterial species known to produce hydrogen sulfide, a compound toxic to seagrass, which may stunt seagrass growth. Plants previously exposed to warmer conditions suffer more from those changes in microbes. The researchers found seagrass growing in sediments from warm areas produces 34% less biomass when the natural sediment microbes weren’t disturbed. The findings show how bacterial communities are a hidden factor in recovering and restoring seagrass. “Just as microalgal symbionts (tiny organisms that rely on sunlight as energy) are key to the health of coral reefs, bacterial symbionts nestled at the roots and sediment of seagrasses can influence whether seagrass survives or declines,” said Dr. Jongen. “Even though seagrasses may look okay at first glance, what we’ve found below ground under increased temperature tells a different story.” Just as heat waves have hit terrestrial plants, marine heat waves have thinned out once lush and widespread seagrass meadows along the Australian coast. They are mainly found in shallow coastal waters and estuaries from tropical Queensland all the way down to the cool, temperate waters of Tasmania. Microbial communities also shape marine plants’ responses to environmental stress. Heat stress isn’t only about hot water. “Increased water temperatures dramatically change the ecosystem of microbes living among the seagrass roots and how microbes co-exist,” said senior author Associate Professor Ziggy Marzinelli from the University of Sydney. “Under heat stress, the microbial communities around seagrass roots shift in ways that can harm rather than help the plant.”   How decades of industrial history created a real-world climate experiment In Myuna Bay in Lake Macquarie, history has created the perfect conditions for the research team to answer the question—”what would happen to seagrasses and microbes if water temperatures increased as projected by climate change models?” Since 1984, Eraring Power Station has continually fed a plume of warm estuarine water into the lake. This has made some of the lake waters up to three degrees warmer than ambient temperature for nearly four decades, mimicking both marine heat waves and what future oceans could be like along the Eastern Australia coast by 2090. “This has inadvertently created realistic conditions for the ultimate ‘gardening experiment’—for us to test how seagrass and below ground microbe health is shaped by exposure to higher-than-normal ocean temperatures,” said Dr. Jongen. “Locals are aware of the temperature increase in the area. It also has a reputation as a popular fishing spot because the hot water attracts a lot of fish species and everything from sharks to turtles have been seen here.” The research team transplanted Zostera muelleri, a species of sea grass native to coastal areas of Australia, into the lakebed. They also extracted and analyzed DNA to find the type of bacterial communities from the sediment and sediment from the seagrass roots to find how their composition changed at different temperatures. That was when they uncovered the change in bacterial communities and especially the relative increase of bacterial species that suppressed seagrass growth. “Our study highlights the overlooked role of microbes in tipping the balance in marine environments,” said Professor Paul Gribben from the University of New South Wales. “Seagrass restoration should not just focus on selecting species that are more heat tolerant, but also look deeper, below the ground surface—and, if needed, address microbial communities before transplanting or restoring seagrass meadows.”   More information: This article is republished from Phys.org Read the research paper here: Ocean warming indirectly affects seagrass performance through effects on sediment microbial communities – Jongen – New Phytologist – Wiley Online Library

Read More »
Crab in seagrass in Orkney

Nitrogen pollution identified as major driver of biodiversity loss in UK coastal waters

A new study of the British Isles’ coastal ecosystems has revealed that nitrogen enrichment is significantly reducing the abundance and variety of marine life. The research, published by scientists at Swansea University and the charity Project Seagrass, warns that increasing nutrient flows are overriding local habitat conditions to restructure and deplete coastal biodiversity. While the Planetary Boundaries for nitrogen and phosphorus flows have already been exceeded globally, this study provides a rare, large-scale assessment of how these nutrients impact the fine-scale diversity of our coastlines. Factors causing the pollution include sewage, agricultural waste, and poor land management. The study examined seagrass meadows in 16 different marine environments, including estuaries, lagoons, and islands. These ranged from the Orkneys Islands and the Firth of Forth to the Solent and the Island of Skomer. The findings were stark: higher nitrogen concentrations were consistently associated with a decrease in animal abundance and species richness. Specifically, the researchers found that an increase of nitrogen could correspond to an approximately 90 per cent decrease in the abundance of life per unit of available habitat area. “Eutrophication, the enrichment of water by nutrients, remains one of the most pressing environmental challenges in coastal waters, particularly regarding biodiversity loss,” said the authors. Key findings: Nitrogen as a driver: Nitrogen enrichment emerged as a consistent driver of biodiversity loss across the UK, even when accounting for the physical complexity of the environment; Habitat sensitivity: Coastal and lagoon environments showed the strongest declines under enhanced enrichment. In particular, phosphorus exhibited a devastating negative effect on life within lagoon environments; Site-specific impact: While some moderate enrichment was tolerated in specific estuarine settings, further enrichment in already impacted coastal sites exacerbated the loss of species; and, Beyond physical structure: Surprisingly, the physical traits of the marine vegetation (such as leaf length or biomass) had little influence on diversity compared to the overwhelming impact of local nutrient regimes. Crab in seagrass in Orkney Credit Lewis Jefferies Gastropods in seagrass. Credit Lewis Jefferies The researchers argue that current regional conservation targets may be insufficient. Because the effects of nutrients are “context-dependent,” effective management requires strategies tailored to the specific ecological conditions of a site. They concluded: “Our findings demonstrate that eutrophication alters biodiversity in complex ways. Effective management will require site-specific nutrient reduction and monitoring strategies that reflect local conditions rather than uniform regional targets.” The research was conducted by scientists from Swansea University, and Project Seagrass. The team used standardised sampling and mixed-effects modelling to isolate the drivers of biodiversity across the UK seascape. Read the research in full in Global Ecology and Conservation.

Read More »
Juvenile señorita (Oxyjulis californica) utilize the protective canopy of the open-coast seagrass restoration site at Button Shell, Catalina Island.

Catalina Island study highlights open-coast seagrass restoration success

New research led by scientists at University of California’s San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography is shining a spotlight on one of the ocean’s most overlooked habitats: seagrass. Led by Scripps Oceanography Ph.D. candidate Rilee Sanders, the study documented the first successful restoration of open-coast seagrass (common eelgrass). The findings offer promising insight into the feasibility of restoring high-value coastal habitats in the future. The work is published in the journal Estuaries and Coasts. Seagrasses act as ecosystem engineers, creating complex underwater habitats that support life along the coast. Around the world, these habitats are increasingly threatened by climate change and human impacts like coastal development, invasive species and overfishing. While most West Coast seagrass research has focused on protected bays and estuaries, this study focused on open-coast areas off Catalina Island. Drawing on nearly a decade’s worth of surveys, the team examined everything from seagrass structure to fish communities and ocean conditions to identify where restoration might succeed. Juvenile señorita (Oxyjulis californica) utilize the protective canopy of the open-coast seagrass restoration site at Button Shell, Catalina Island. Credit Adam ObazaPaua Marine Research Group Two bat rays (Myliobatis californica) soaring over an open-coast eelgrass (Zostera marina) bed on Catalina Island. Credit Adam ObazaPaua Marine Research Group The results were encouraging, as the researchers completed the first transplant of open-coast common eelgrass (also known as Zostera marina). Within a year, the restored site began functioning like a natural meadow, supporting fish communities and ecosystem structure, and by year two, it was even healthier and more biodiverse than natural reference meadows. “Seagrasses are kind of an unsung hero of nearshore ocean habitats,” said Sanders. “They provide nursery habitat for young fish, store carbon in sediments and support immense biodiversity in places that might otherwise be sandy seafloor. Being able to quickly restore that structure and function on the open coast is really exciting.” The findings suggest that open-coast environments could become a valuable new tool for seagrass restoration and conservation in California, especially as coastal development and climate change reduce the available suitable habitat in bays and estuaries. And sometimes restoration has surprising benefits. During monitoring, researchers even captured images of an endangered sea turtle visiting the restored meadow. In short: if we plant seagrass, the ecosystem may follow. More information: This article is republished from PHYS.ORG and provided by the University of California – San Diego. Rilee D. Sanders et al, Open-Coast Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Transplant Catalyzes Rapid Mirroring of Structure and Function of Extant Eelgrasses, Estuaries and Coasts (2025). DOI: 10.1007/s12237-025-01609-x

Read More »
A group of volunteers snorkel in a seagrass meadow in Porthdinllaen in North Wales.

Seagrass meadows could be good for your health – yet they’re disappearing fast

The wellbeing benefits of nature are often linked to forests or habitats that support diverse pollinators. Spending time in green spaces reduces stress and anxiety, for example. By contrast, the benefits of the ocean are more commonly associated with fishing, exciting creatures such as whales and dolphins, or adventure watersports, rather than as a living system that directly supports human wellbeing. Yet growing scientific evidence shows that marine biodiversity is fundamental to the health of people, animals and the planet. The “one health” concept (a term now widely used by the World Health Organization) captures this connection by recognising that human health, animal health and environmental health are inseparable. Our new paper in the journal BioScience applies this idea to seagrass meadows for the first time. We argue that healthy coastal ecosystems such as seagrass meadows are not optional extras, but essential infrastructure for resilient societies. Coastal seas host some of the most biologically rich ecosystems on Earth. Kelp forests, oyster reefs, saltmarshes and seagrass meadows form the foundation of complex food webs that support fisheries, regulate water quality and protect shorelines. These habitats influence everything from food security and livelihoods to exposure to pollution and disease. Take seagrass meadows as one example. These underwater flowering plants stabilise sediments, reduce wave energy and filter nutrients from coastal waters. The benefits ultimately reduce coastal flooding and make the environment cleaner. They also support young fish and invertebrates that later populate offshore fisheries. Seagrass and water quality exist in a delicate balance. When the quality becomes too poor the seagrass becomes less abundant, and it’s then less able to act as a filter. This further exacerbates the water quality problems with implications for fish and other wildife. Similar patterns are seen when kelp forests collapse or shellfish reefs are lost. This is why we need better recognition for the important roles these habitats play. Marine biodiversity also helps regulate the Earth’s climate. Coastal habitats such as seagrass capture and store carbon and can reduce the negative effects of storms and flooding. While saving these ecosystems can’t replace the need to cut greenhouse gas emissions, their loss can accelerate climate impacts at local and regional scales increasing risks to coastal communities. Despite their importance, many marine ecosystems have been severely degraded. Pollution, overfishing, coastal development and warming seas have reduced biodiversity along coastlines around the globe. These losses are rarely visible to the public as they’re hard to see. This is because these losses occur underwater and gradually. Yet their consequences are increasingly felt through declining fisheries, poorer water quality and greater vulnerability to extreme weather. These factors all ultimately affect our health and wellbeing. Our new paper argues that restoring marine biodiversity requires a shift in how success is measured. Conservation and restoration efforts are often judged by the amount of hectares of habitat planting planted or short-term project outcomes. While these metrics are easy to calculate, they can obscure the real goal: the recovery of ecological function and long-term resilience. Biodiverse seagrass habitats have huge value to fisheries, from industrial fishing vessels to communities fishing by hand. Richard Unsworth A collaborative approach This is where the one health perspective becomes particularly valuable. By linking environmental condition to human and animal health, it encourages collaboration across disciplines that rarely interact. Coastal management, public health, fisheries policy and climate adaptation are often treated separately yet they all depend on the same underlying ecosystems. Examples from around the world show that biodiversity can do miraculous things, such as seagrass meadows trapping pathogens, reducing harmful bacteria in coastal waters that kills corals and contaminates seafood. That’s nature directly buffering human and animal health. We also know that when habitat is degraded and lost, it displaces associated wildife. This can lead to greater interactions between wild and farmed animals. In the case of seagrass loss, typically we know that geese become displaced to farmland to graze. This has the potential to increase interactions with farmed animals and could enhance spread of diseases such as bird flu. Recovery of our ocean habitats and the wildlife, plants and microbes that live there is possible. Where water quality improves and physical disturbance is reduced, marine habitats can rebound, bringing measurable benefits for biodiversity fisheries and coastal protection. Importantly, the benefits then extend to people – cleaner water, a more affable environment and better, more abundant food. However restoration of these habitats alone cannot compensate for ongoing damage. Protecting what remains is consistently more effective and less costly than rebuilding ecosystems after they collapse. Marine biodiversity may feel distant from everyday life but it quietly supports many of the systems that societies depend on. Recognising oceans and coasts as part of our shared health system rather than as separate from it could transform how we manage and value the marine environment. In a changing climate, this shift may prove essential not only for nature but for our own resilience. This article was originally published in The Conservation.

Read More »
Subtidal seagrass meadow.

Can seagrass survive extreme heat? Exploring how different species withstand elevated water temperatures

Extreme heat can have a devastating effect on seagrass, but new research from Edith Cowan University (ECU) could shape how these vitally important marine ecosystems are managed and restored. In separate studies carried out on both the west and east coasts of Australia, researchers have investigated how seagrasses stand up to marine heat waves and prolonged ocean warming. Executive Dean of ECU’s School of Science, Professor Marnie Campbell, conducted the research during her time at Central Queensland University. She noted that insights into how different intertidal species respond to elevated water temperatures are critical for informing future seagrass management. “The outcomes demonstrate that the way we protect and restore seagrass will need to change as the climate warms,” Professor Campbell said. Ph.D. candidate Nicole Said from ECU’s Center for Marine Ecosystem Research said that not all seagrass species faced the same climate risk, with her research findings on Western Australian seagrass ecosystems indicating that subtidal seagrass meadows could be restored with more heat-resistant populations of the same species. “By identifying and sourcing heat-tolerant populations—sometimes just kilometers away—we can translate this knowledge into on-the-ground action, incorporating resilient populations into restoration to create climate-ready meadows,” Ms. Said explained. West coast Ms. Said is lead author of the study “Seagrasses are most vulnerable to marine heat waves in tropical zones: local‐scale and broad climatic zone variation in thermal tolerances,” which looked at six species along the Western Australian coast, spanning broad thermal gradients from temperate to tropical climates. The study is published in the journal New Phytologist. “Western Australia is an ideal setting for studying seagrass thermal tolerances, and there is a critical need for this data due to WA being a global hotspot for marine climate impacts,” Ms. Said explained. “We can use this information to look at which species might be vulnerable during future marine heat waves, and which ones we should focus our conservation value on.” The study revealed that seagrasses are most vulnerable to marine heat waves in tropical zones. It also showed that climate risk varied across seagrass species, with a 10-degree Celsius difference in thermal optima, and even neighboring populations showed different heat tolerances. “Some populations are better equipped to deal with the heat, and in some cases, the tough ones might be growing next door,” Ms. Said explained. “This shows that not all species face the same level of risk from climate change, and a one-size-fits-all approach is not appropriate for management of thermally vulnerable seagrass species.” The findings could also benefit restoration of seagrass meadows that have already suffered from thermal warming and marine heat wave events. “We can use this information to help build climate-ready meadows, by migrating plants or seeds from more heat-resistant populations into thermally vulnerable areas.” East coast Professor Campbell’s study “Varying vulnerabilities: Seagrass species under threat from prolonged ocean warming” is a paper published in Limnology and Oceanography that examined the impacts of elevated water temperatures on five intertidal species in Gladstone, Queensland, with a focus on improving seagrass restoration. “This study offers an understanding of how climate change might impact these seagrasses, whose ecological functions are not easily replaced once lost,” Professor Campbell said. “Seagrasses are a critically important ecosystem that provides food, shelter and nursery areas for a wide variety of marine life, so with changing climate, it is at risk in different ways. We wanted to understand how these species react when temperatures reach dangerous extremes, which is becoming more common with climate change.” Professor Campbell said they found intertidal pools where the water was more than 40 degrees for weeks on end. “The tide would go out, and the seagrass would be left high and dry, quite often in little, tiny pockets of water which would reach massive temperatures,” Professor Campbell said. “To restore or manage the species, you have to look at the distinct thermal thresholds of the different species—you can’t treat them all as one. “This knowledge helps us to decide which species to plant where—including the best substrate and water depth; so we can restore these ecosystems more effectively.” Professor Campbell said the species she studied were commonly found in Australia and other parts of the world, with the outcomes leading to global impact. “There were two species that were really good candidates for future-proofing restoration in regions that are warming up,” Professor Campbell said. “Two were highly vulnerable and will require more protection from heat stress, or if you’re going to restore them, you need to find micro-climates that are cooler for them—for example, if they are in the sub-tropics, you would look at temperate areas to restore them.” More information: This article is republished from PHYS.ORG and provided by the Edith Cowan University. Nicole Said et al, Seagrasses are most vulnerable to marine heatwaves in tropical zones: local‐scale and broad climatic zone variation in thermal tolerances, New Phytologist (2025). DOI: 10.1111/nph.70742 Marnie L. Campbell et al, Varying vulnerabilities: Seagrass species under threat from prolonged ocean warming, Limnology and Oceanography (2025). DOI: 10.1002/lno.70156

Read More »